So Who Are The Controlled Opposition
Have we been fooled?
I’m betting that anyone who’s landed here already has an idea what ‘Controlled Opposition’ refers to, but just in case it’s a new concept, or you’re not clear what it actually refers to, here’s a description, typical tactics and and a short video below.
Controlled Opposition: a strategy in which an individual, organization, or movement is covertly controlled or influenced by a 3rd party and the controlled entity’s true purpose is something other than its publicly stated purpose. The controlled entity serves a role of mass deception, surveillance and/or political/social manipulation. In most cases the controlled party is portrayed as being in opposition to the interests of the controlling party.
Typical tactics of controlled opposition agents:
Preempt or neutralize true but negative information by having it be disclosed or championed in a skewed/stigmatized manner by a person or group. The truth can be peppered with disinformation or the truth of the message can be neutralized by association due to the extreme, radical, or unpalatable positions held by the controlled entity (person or group) who is disclosing the information or is “championing” a position. The stigmatized or adulterated truth in turn steers people away from truthful information which would normally cause criticism or a serious backlash against the controlling party. Stigmatized truth also greatly inhibits independent research into sensitive areas (usually involving criminal acts by the controlling entity) and serves to manipulate social dynamics in aHappy Hunting!!! manner in which it becomes taboo to publicly discuss sensitive (albeit critically important) subjects.
The so-called ‘alternative’ media, including alleged free speech platforms, is infested with controlled opposition agents, making it particularly difficult for new truth seekers to avoid the disinformation and misdirection perpetrated by these agents.
At this point, there are so many controlled opposition agents, that it is safest to assume that most of the current sites or platforms you utilize, and any new site or platform you visit is controlled opposition until it’s clear that they’re not.
Platforms often claim to be free speech but at the same time use vague, flexible terms like ‘extreme views or beliefs’ or ‘hate speech’, in order to allow them to censor whatever speech they want. Many platforms also claim to be for free speech but shadow ban posts, videos or comments, or just delete subscribers with such vague reasons as ‘violated site policies’.
And here’s a short video (9 Minutes), which discusses controlled opposition and red flags that can be used to spot agents:
CONTROLLED OPPOSITION IS RAMPANT IN ALTERNATIVE MEDIA
I just realized now how I was successfully played on Igor Chudov's channel. I see that their goal was to keep the rubes in the tent regarding the "covid vaxxine bad" meme while making sure that nobody started thinking seriously about how pathogenic virus particles have never been proven to and in fact don't exist.
I ended up being isolated with a good-cop bad-cop sort of situation. One guy saying totally stupid stuff designed to irritate me, and it worked. A second guy who was feigning being irritated. The whole goal was to shadow ban me, to keep me isolated while they brainwashed further the people who'd shown themselves to be not quite brainwashed enough. I got taken out of the play.
What was new was that they gave me a fake colleague.
It was clever and interesting. They won't get me a second time, but the thing that is unavoidable is that it will make me more likely to be suspicious of a potential ally in the future. So once again, they won that one to a certain extent.
I'm reminded of the scene in "They Live" where the star and the black colleague tap on each other hard until he finally gets him to wear the sunglasses and he (the black guy) sees that it was for real.
We are absolutely living the film "they live". John Carpenter is the biggest hero there is.